प्रजा अधीन राजा समूह | Right to Recall Group

Comparing Right to recall Vs Right to reject

Comparing to find which gives better result?
If we chose less result giving strategy and find it less effective when implemented, it has wasted all activists’ time and reduced moral.
Please edit, add any advantages, defects, if we have missed. Spread, so that we can decide which is better.

The name `Right to reject` given by Anna is first of all stolen from others like Rajiv Dixit who used it to mean rejection ANY DAY.
Hijacking these words, Team Anna wants to change their meaning and give a false sense of satisfaction to activists.
The right term if you want to imply Anna version will be pseudo-right to reject , which is once every five years.

Those supporting these type of harmful laws with loopholes never support similar procedures for their offices /homes.Why ?

You have not mentioined this fact, please include that.

If we do not ask hard questions, to our leaders and care for their image, then we will go nowhere. So, it is must to ask hard questions without any personal comments.

Please see http://www.righttorecall.info/405.pdf

where Right to reject, any day is given. Please compare that with pseudo-right to reject, every five years.

What Team Anna is proposing is actually NOTA., to be used every five years. They have hijacked words ` Right to reject` only to weaken the cause of Shri Rajiv Dixit for Right to reject, any day.

Edited the file and putting it in attachment as version 1.03

Instead of making this table, I would tell IAC activists that ANY procedure be it recall, reject , replace or whatever name , if we have to wait for 5 years for it, is USELESS and does not yield any results.

We , common citizens already have procedures which we can use every 5 years to recall/reject/replace or whatever name, but that is useless since once the public servant assumes power, the public servant is no longer accountable to the common citizens for 5 years.

The elite have procedures whereby make their servants accountable any day by having procedure to replace/reject/recall ANY DAY.

We need procedures which the common citizens can use ANY DAY, which act as a deterrent for the servant ANY DAY, whatever be the name.

====
Using this approach I am able to convince IAC and other activists that procedures which can be used EVERY 5 YEARS are useless.
Still, I support variety because maybe other method reaches to other person . Different things appeal to different persons.

Made some editions. Please see attachment.

pls see v1.05
i need technical help in
-----------------------------------
-pushing point 3 to point 2
-pushing point 5 to point 3
- pushing point2 to point 4
and others similarly below
---------------------------------------
-to bring alignment into many deviated points
-----------------------------------------
-suggest me a place where people can send suggestions, and it will be available to all to see. but i should be able to delete if it is irrevalent or abusive language
------------------------------------------------

thanks
shiva