The name `Right to reject` given by Anna is first of all stolen from others like Rajiv Dixit who used it to mean rejection ANY DAY.
Hijacking these words, Team Anna wants to change their meaning and give a false sense of satisfaction to activists.
The right term if you want to imply Anna version will be pseudo-right to reject , which is once every five years.
Those supporting these type of harmful laws with loopholes never support similar procedures for their offices /homes.Why ?
You have not mentioined this fact, please include that.
If we do not ask hard questions, to our leaders and care for their image, then we will go nowhere. So, it is must to ask hard questions without any personal comments.
Please see http://www.righttorecall.info/405.pdf
where Right to reject, any day is given. Please compare that with pseudo-right to reject, every five years.
What Team Anna is proposing is actually NOTA., to be used every five years. They have hijacked words ` Right to reject` only to weaken the cause of Shri Rajiv Dixit for Right to reject, any day.